Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Chundru v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCA 480 Appeal from: Application for extension of time: Chundru v Minister for Immigration [2016] FCCA 3301
File number(s): VID 1419 of 2016
Judge(s): GREENWOOD J
Date of judgment: 1 May 2017
Date of publication of reasons: 9 May 2017
Catchwords: MIGRATION – consideration of an application for an extension of time for leave to appeal
Cases cited: Bienstein v Bienstein (2003) 195 ALR 225 Décor Corporation Pty Ltd v Dart Industries Inc (1991) 33 FCR 397 Samsung Electronics Co Ltd v Apple Inc (2011) 217 FCR 238
Date of hearing: 1 May 2017
Date of last submissions: 1 May 2017
Registry: Victoria
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 13
Counsel for the Applicant: The applicant appeared in person
Solicitor for the First Respondent: Sparke Helmore Lawyers
ORDERS VID 1419 of 2016
BETWEEN: SRI SATYA SEKHAR CHUNDRU Applicant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND BORDER PROTECTION First Respondent
ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL
Second Respondent
JUDGE: GREENWOOD J DATE OF ORDER: 1 MAY 2017
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The application is dismissed. 2. The applicant pay the costs of the first respondent of and incidental to the application to be taxed or agreed. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate