Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Wu v Li (No 2) [2017] FCA 501 Appeal from: Li v Wu [2016] FCCA 2836
File number: ACD 96 of 2016
Judge: RARES J
Date of judgment: 28 April 2017
Catchwords: APPEAL AND NEW TRIAL – where trial judge extended life of creditor's petition retrospectively after petition expired under s 52(4) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) and made sequestration order – where appeal upheld and sequestration order set aside – where trustees appointed to administer bankrupt's estate under s 157 of the Bankruptcy Act 1976 (Cth) and incurred costs and remuneration – whether Court should exercise appellate power under s 28 of Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) to order creditor/respondent and or appellant to pay costs and remuneration incurred by the trustees appointed under s 157 of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) COSTS – Federal Proceedings (Costs) Act 1981 (Cth) – application for costs certificate under s 10(2) – where appeal held trial judge invalidly granted retrospective extension of creditor's petition after petition expired and had been unable to give judgment in proceedings below because petition had lapsed under s 52(4) of the Bankruptcy Act 1976 (Cth) – whether appropriate to grant costs certificate
Legislation: Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) Div 2 Pt VIII, ss 52, 153B Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 28 Federal Proceedings (Costs) Act 1981 (Cth) s 10 Federal Court Rules 2011 r 39.05
Cases cited: Commonwealth v McCormack (1984) 155 CLR 273 Cox v Hakes (1890) 15 App Cas 506 Flint v Richard Busuttil & Company Pty Ltd (2013) 216 FCR 375 Griffiths v Boral Resources (Qld) Pty Ltd (2006) 154 FCR 554 Pattison v Hadjimouratis (2006) 155 FCR 226 Wu v Li [2017] FCA 500
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate