Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Khatri (Trustee) v McDonald [2017] FCA 503 File number: QUD 160 of 2017
Judge: LOGAN J
Date of judgment: 2 May 2017
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – substantial service – whether service should be deemed under r 10.23 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) – service by email – whether personal service is "not practicable" – whether attempts were reasonable – where no personal details about respondent's residential or other address can be discovered despite exhaustive search – where respondent's email address is known and evidence supported inference that originating process and statement of claim had come to respondent's attention – order deeming service to have occurred made BANKRUPTCY AND INSOLVENCY – substantial service – whether service should be deemed under r 10.23 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) – service by email – whether personal service is "not practicable" – whether attempts were reasonable – where no personal details about respondent's residential or other address can be discovered despite exhaustive search – where respondent's email address is known and evidence supported inference that originating process and statement of claim had come to respondent's attention – order deeming service to have occurred made
Legislation: Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) s 120
Date of hearing: 2 May 2017
Registry: Queensland
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: General and Personal Insolvency
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 10
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr C Wilkins
Solicitor for the Applicant: Australian Law Partners
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate