Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Securities and Investments Commission, in the matter of Whitebox Trading Pty Ltd v Whitebox Trading Pty Ltd (No 4) [2017] FCA 505 File number: NSD 383 of 2016
Judge: ALLSOP CJ
Date of judgment: 12 May 2017
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for determination of separate question – utility of separate question – defendants not participating as contradictors – costs of separate question
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ss 1041A, 1041B Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 30.01
Cases cited: Gore v Australian Securities and Investments Commission [2017] FCAFC 13; 341 ALR 189 Tax Practitioners Board v HP Kolya Pty Ltd [2015] FCA 472; 232 FCR 34
Date of hearing: 11 May 2017
Registry: New South Wales
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: Corporations and Corporate Insolvency
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 17
Counsel for the Plaintiff: Mr JA Halley SC and Mr IJM Ahmed
Solicitor for the Plaintiff: Australian Securities and Investments Commission
Counsel for the Defendants: Mr RG McHugh and Mr L Livingston
Solicitor for the Defendants: Thompson Eslick Solicitors
ORDERS NSD 383 of 2016
IN THE MATTER OF WHITEBOX TRADING PTY LTD (ACN 139 567 598)
BETWEEN: AUSTRALIAN SECURITIES AND INVESTMENTS COMMISSION Plaintiff
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate