Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Bauer Consumer Media Limited v Evergreen Television Pty Ltd [2017] FCA 507 Appeal from: Bauer Consumer Media Ltd and Bauer Media Pty Ltd v Evergreen Television Pty Ltd [2014] ATMO 78
File numbers: NSD 935 of 2014 NSD 682 of 2015
Judge: PERRY J
Date of judgment: 12 May 2017
Catchwords: TRADE MARKS – appeal under s 56, Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth), from decision of delegate of the Registrar of Trademarks refusing opposition to registration of trade mark and allowing registration – registration opposed on ground that applicant for registration was not owner of the mark – failure by opponent to establish first use of the mark – first use by applicant for registration by entry into licencing agreement - whether intention to use the mark in good faith– whether registration application made in bad faith – whether use of mark likely to deceive or confuse – whether use of mark contrary to law – whether leave required to consider new ground raised in closing address on appeal – appeal dismissed TRADE MARKS – application under s 101(2) of Trade Marks Act for removal of trade mark – removal under s 92(4)(a) or (b) on grounds of alleged non-use – where conduct of applicant for removal presented insurmountable obstacle to use for the purposes of s 100(3)(c) – application dismissed EVIDENCE – impact of passage of time on quality of evidence – application of Jones v Dunkel where failure by a party to call potential witnesses – whether necessary for potential witness to be a person over whom the party had control – drawing of adverse inferences where no satisfactory explanation for failure to produce documents
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate