Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
GAIN Capital UK Limited v Citigroup Inc (No 4) [2017] FCA 519 Appeal from: Citigroup Inc v CITYINDEX Limited [2014] ATMO 36
File number: NSD 524 of 2014
Judge: MARKOVIC J
Date of judgment: 16 May 2017
Catchwords: TRADE MARKS – appeal from decision of Registrar of Trade Marks to refuse application to register appellant's trade marks – whether appellant's trade marks are substantially identical with, or deceptively similar to, respondent's registered trade marks in respect of similar services or closely related goods – whether respondent's registered trade marks had acquired a reputation in Australia – whether because of that reputation appellant's trade marks would be likely to deceive or cause confusion – whether the appellant intended to use or authorise the use of its trade marks – appeal allowed
Legislation: Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) ss 7(1), 10, 44, 59, 60
Cases cited: Aston v Harlee Manufacturing Co (1960) 103 CLR 391 Australian Woollen Mills Ltd v F S Walton and Company Ltd (1937) 58 CLR 641 Berlei Hestia Industries Limited v The Bali Company Inc (1973) 129 CLR 353 Coca-Cola Company v PepsiCo Inc (No 2) [2014] FCA 1287; (2014) 322 ALR 505 Conde Nast Publications Pty Ltd v Taylor [1998] FCA 864; (1998) 41 IPR 505 Cooper Engineering Company Pty Ltd v Sigmund Pumps Ltd (1952) 86 CLR 536 Crazy Ron's Communications Pty Ltd & Ors v Mobileworld Communications Pty Ltd & Ors [2004] FCAFC 196; (2004) 209 ALR 1 Delfi Chocolate Manufacturing SA v Mars Australia Pty Ltd [2015] FCA 1065; (2015) 115 IPR 82 E & J Gallo Winery v Lion Nathan Australia Pty Ltd [2008] FCA 934; (2008) 77 IPR 69 E. & J. Gallo Winery v Lion Nathan Australia Pty Limited (2009) 175 FCR 386 Food Channel Network Pty Ltd v Television Food Network GP (2010) 185 FCR 9 Hill Industries Ltd v Bitek Pty Ltd (2011) 214 FCR 396 Kowa Company Ltd v N V Organon [2005] FCA 1282; (2005) 223 ALR 27; 66 IPR 131 Lomas v Winton Shire Council [2002] FCAFC 413 McCormick & Co Inc v McCormick [2000] FCA 1335; (2000) 51 IPR 102 Nikken Wellness Pty Ltd v van Voorst [2003] FCA 816 Pfizer Products Inc v Karam (2006) 219 FCR 585 Pioneer Computers Australia Pty Ltd v Pioneer KK (2009) 176 FCR 300 Polo Textile Industries Pty Ltd v Domestic Textile Corporation Pty Limited (1993) 42 FCR 227 REA Group Ltd v Real Estate 1 Ltd (2013) 217 FCR 327 Registrar of Trade Marks v Woolworths (1999) 93 FCR 365 Sports Warehouse Inc v Fry Consulting Pty Ltd (2010) 186 FCR 519 Telstra Corporation Ltd v Phone Directories Company Australia Pty Ltd (2015) 237 FCR 388 Tivo Inc v Vivo International Corporation Pty Ltd [2012] FCA 252 Torpedoes Sportswear Pty Limited v Thorpedo Enterprises Pty Limited (2003) 132 FCR 326 Vivo International Corporation Pty Ltd v TiVo Inc [2012] FCAFC 159; (2012) 294 ALR 661 Davison MJ, Shanahan's Australian Law of Trade Marks and Passing Off (6th ed, Thomson Reuters, 2016)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate