Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Halkalia Pty Ltd (No 3) [2017] FCA 522 File number: VID 362 of 2011
Judge TRACEY J
Date of judgment: 17 May 2017
Catchwords: CONTEMPT OF COURT – appropriate penalty – where fourth respondent pleaded guilty to wilful and contumacious contempts of court constituted by failures to comply with previous orders of the court – where fourth respondent of advanced age and ill health
Legislation: Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) Sch 2 ("Australian Consumer Law") s 232 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 31 Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) ss 52, 59(2) Associations Incorporation Act 1985 (SA) Magistrates' Courts Act 1989 (Vic) ss 134, 135
Cases cited: Advan Investments Pty Ltd v Dean Gleeson Motor Sales Pty Ltd [2003] VSC 201 AGL Energy Limited v Hardy [2017] FCA 420 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v ACN 117 372 915 Pty Ltd (in liq) (formerly Advanced Medical Institute Pty Limited) [2016] FCA 1437 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Halkalia Pty Ltd (No 2) [2012] ¶ATPR 42-399; [2012] FCA 535 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v World Netsafe Pty Ltd (2003) 133 FCR 279; [2003] FCA 1501 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Michalik (2004) 52 ACSR 115; [2004] NSWSC 1259 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Reid (No 2) [2006] FCA 700 Burwood Council v Ruan [2008] NSWLEC 167 Deckers Outdoor Corporation Pty Ltd v Farley (No 6) [2010] FCA 391 Director, Fair Work Building Industry Inspectorate v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (2015) 229 FCR 331; [2015] FCAFC 59 Hoffman v Chief of Army (2004) 137 FCR 520; [2004] FCAFC 148 Humane Society International Inc v Kyodo Senpaku Kaisha Ltd (2015) 238 FCR 209; [2015] FCA 1275 Hurd v Zomojo Pty Ltd [2015] FCAFC 148 Infa-Secure Pty Limited v Crocker (No 2) (2016) 338 ALR 586; [2016] FCA 202 Kazal v Thunder Studios Inc (California) [2017] FCA 238 Louis Vuitton Malletier SA v Design Elegance Pty Ltd (2006) 149 FCR 494; [2006] FCA 83 R v Miceli [1998] 4 VR 588 R v O'Neill [1979] 2 NSWLR 582 R v Smith (1987) 44 SASR 587 R v Tsiaras [1996] 1 VR 398 R v Verdins (2007) 16 VR 269; [2007] VSCA 102 Thunder Studios Inc (California) v Kazal (No 2) [2017] FCA 202 Vaysman v Deckers Outdoor Corporation Inc (2011) 276 ALR 596; [2011] FCAFC 17
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate