Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Luitel v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCA 529 Appeal from: Luitel v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2016] FCCA 3018
File number: NSD 2237 of 2016
Judge: MARKOVIC J
Date of judgment: 18 May 2017
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 36.03, 36.05 Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth)
Cases cited: Hunter Valley Developments Pty Ltd v Cohen (1984) 3 FCR 344 SZQCZ v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2012] FCA 91
Date of hearing: 11 May 2017
Registry: New South Wales
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
Category: No Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 45
Solicitor for the Applicant: Mr M Newman, Newman & Associates
Solicitor for the First Respondent: Ms C Hillary, DLA Piper Australia
Counsel for the Second Respondent: The second respondent filed a submitting notice, save as to costs.
ORDERS NSD 2237 of 2016
BETWEEN: ASHOK KUMAR LUITEL Applicant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND BORDER PROTECTION First Respondent
ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL Second Respondent
JUDGE: MARKOVIC J DATE OF ORDER: 18 MAY 2017
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The application for an extension of time filed on 30 December 2016 be dismissed. 2. The applicant pay the first respondent's costs as agreed or taxed. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate