Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
AFT16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCA 574 Appeal from: Application for extension of time: AFT16 v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2016] FCCA 2302
File number: NSD 198 of 2017
Judge: BARKER J
Date of judgment: 24 May 2017
Catchwords: MIGRATION – application for protection (class XA) visa – application for extension of time to appeal from Federal Circuit Court decision – whether Tribunal failed to consider full integers of claim – whether Tribunal failed to give proper weight to evidence – applicant no longer in Australia – application dismissed by reason of non-attendance
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 5(1)(a), 36(2)(a), 36(2)(aa) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 35.33
Cases cited: AFT16 v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2016] FCCA 2302
Date of hearing: 24 May 2017
Registry: New South Wales
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 53
Counsel for the Applicant: The Applicant did not appear
Counsel for the First Respondent: Mr AE Flick
Solicitor for the First Respondent: DLA Piper
ORDERS NSD 198 of 2017
BETWEEN: AFT16 Applicant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND BORDER PROTECTION First Respondent
ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL Second Respondent
JUDGE: BARKER J DATE OF ORDER: 24 MAY 2017
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The application for extension of time to appeal be dismissed. 2. The applicant pay the costs of the first respondent, to be assessed if not agreed. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate