Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
CLS15 v Federal Circuit Court of Australia [2017] FCA 577 Appeal from: CLS15 v Minister for Immigration & Border Protection [2016] FCCA 2164
File number: SAD 268 of 2016
Judge: CHARLESWORTH J
Date of judgment: 26 May 2017
Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – beneficial reading of reasons for administrative decision – whether unexpressed finding should be attributed to decision-maker by implication – reasons disclosing confusion of concepts and jurisdictional error – visa applicant's claim not determined by Tribunal MIGRATION – protection visa – application of complementary protection regime to a non-citizen making a failed claim to be a refugee – whether receiving country would receive involuntary returnee – significance of potential inability to effect a forcible return
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth), ss 5, 36, 65, 91R, 189, 198, 200, 201, 202, 203 Migration Amendment (Complementary Protection) Act 2011 (Cth)
Cases cited: Applicant WAEE v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2003) 236 FCR 593 Chan Yee Kin v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1989) 169 CLR 379 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Eden (2016) 240 FCR 158 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Stretton (2016) 237 FCR 1 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Li (2013) 249 CLR 332 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v MZYYL (2012) 207 FCR 211 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZMDS (2010) 240 CLR 611 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZQRB (2013) 210 FCR 505 Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang (1996) 185 CLR 259 NABE v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (No 2) (2004) 144 FCR 1
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate