Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Waterton on behalf of the Bidjara People v State of Queensland [2017] FCA 633 Appeal from: Application for leave to appeal: Wyman & Ors on behalf of the Bidjara People v State of Queensland [2016] FCA 777
File numbers: QUD 536 of 2016 QUD 537 of 2016
Judge: REEVES J
Date of judgment: 12 April 2017
Catchwords: APPEAL – practice and procedure – applications for leave to appeal – application for dismissal of applications for want of prosecution – failure to comply with court orders Held: applications for leave to appeal dismissed
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth)
Cases cited: Dowling v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd (No. 2) [2010] FCAFC 28 Wyman & Ors on behalf of the Bidjara People v State of Queensland [2016] FCA 777
Date of hearing: 12 April 2017
Registry: Queensland
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Native Title
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 16
Solicitor for the Applicants: Mr F Jongkind of Frank Jongkind & Co
Solicitor for the First Respondent: Ms A Wilson of Crown Law
Counsel for the Second Respondent: Ms E Longbottom
Solicitor for the Second Respondent: Queensland South Native Title Services
ORDERS QUD 536 of 2016
BETWEEN: ARWA MAY WATERTON & ORS ON BEHALF OF THE BIDJARA PEOPLE Applicant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate