Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Palmer, in the matter of Queensland Nickel Pty Ltd (in liq) v Park (Liquidator) (No 2) [2017] FCA 651 File numbers: QUD 329 of 2016 QUD 580 of 2016
Judge: REEVES J
Date of judgment: 8 June 2017
Catchwords: COSTS – application for indemnity costs – whether "special or unusual features" exist to justify costs awarded on indemnity basis – duties of litigants under ss 37N and 37M of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) – where a party has failed to conduct proceedings quickly, inexpensively and efficiently – application under r 40.13 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) that costs be taxable forthwith – where proceeding relates to the examination of directors of a company under Part 9 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) that will not be finalised by hearing or determination – general power of the Court to award costs under s 43 of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) Held: application granted
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth)
Cases cited: Buggy v Reinisch [2010] FCA 917 Cachia v Hanes (1994) 179 CLR 403 DSE (Holdings) Pty Ltd v InterTan Inc (2004) 51 ACSR 555; [2004] FCA 1251 Latoudis v Casey (1990) 170 CLR 534 Palmer v Ayres (2016) 91 ALJR 325; [2017] HCA 5 Palmer, in the matter of Queensland Nickel Pty Ltd (in liq) v Park (Liquidator) [2017] FCA 618 TSG Franchise Management Pty Ltd v Cigarette & Gift Warehouse (Franchising) Pty Ltd (No 3) [2016] FCA 828
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate