Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Director of Consumer Affairs Victoria v Daiso Industries (Australia) Pty Ltd [2017] FCA 683 File number: VID 950 of 2016
Judge: MOSHINSKY J
Date of judgment: 16 June 2017
Catchwords: CONSUMER LAW – product safety of consumer goods – alleged contraventions of product safety standards – where goods in question included plastic bath toys and plastic animal toys – whether the goods were "toys for children up to and including 36 months of age" and so covered by applicable product safety standards
Legislation: Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth), Sch 2, Australian Consumer Law, ss 106, 136, 138, 232 Australian Consumer Law and Fair Trading Act 2012 (Vic), ss 107, 109, 110; Australian Consumer Law (Victoria), ss 106, 136, 228, 232, 246, 247 Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth), s 39B
Cases cited: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Online Dealz Pty Ltd [2016] FCA 732 Director of Consumer Affairs Victoria v Dimmeys Stores Pty Ltd (2013) 213 FCR 559 Director of Consumer Affairs Victoria v DW International Trading Pty Ltd [2010] VSC 515 Director of Consumer Affairs Victoria v Gibson [2017] FCA 240 Director of Consumer Affairs Victoria v H&C Trading Pty Ltd [2010] VSC 629 Director of Consumer Affairs Victoria v Midas Trading (Aust) Pty Ltd (2009) 25 VR 1 Walker v Sell (2016) 245 FCR 308
Date of hearing: 15 June 2017
Registry: Victoria
Division: General Division
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate