Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Securities and Investments Commission v McCormack (No 2) [2017] FCA 684 Appeal from: McCormack and Australian Securities and Investments Commission [2016] AATA 1021
File number: VID 6 of 2017
Judge: O'CALLAGHAN J
Date of judgment: 19 June 2017
Catchwords: COSTS – whether the Court should issue a certificate under the Federal Proceedings (Costs) Act 1981 (Cth) to unsuccessful respondent
Legislation: Federal Proceedings (Costs) Act 1981 (Cth), s 6(1)
Cases cited: Anti-Doping Rule Violation Panel v XZTT (No 2) [2013] FCAFC 135 Bullock v The Federated Furnishing Trades Society of Australasia (No 2) (1985) 5 FCR 476 Richards v Faulls Pty Ltd [1971] WAR 129
Date of hearing: 15 June 2017
Registry: Victoria
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: Corporations and Corporate Insolvency
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 11
Counsel for the Applicant: Dr P Bender
Solicitor for the Applicant: Australian Securities and Investments Commission
Counsel for the Respondent: Ms R Ellyard
Solicitor for the Respondent: Doogue O'Brien George Pty Ltd
ORDERS VID 6 of 2017
BETWEEN: AUSTRALIAN SECURITIES AND INVESTMENTS COMMISSION
Applicant
AND: GERARD MCCORMACK
Respondent
JUDGE: O'Callaghan j DATE OF ORDER: 19 june 2017
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The respondent be granted a certificate to the effect that in the opinion of the Court it would be appropriate for the Attorney-General to authorise a payment under the Federal Proceedings (Costs) Act 1981 (Cth) to the respondent in respect of: (a) the costs incurred by the respondent in relation to the appeal; and (b) the costs incurred by the applicant in respect of the appeal that are required to be paid by the respondent in pursuance of the order of the Court of 15 June 2017. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate