Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Higginbotham v Kerr [2017] FCA 686 File number: NSD 641 of 2017
Judge: BURLEY J
Date of judgment: 19 June 2017
Catchwords: EVIDENCE – application reopened to file additional evidence – evidence revealed material nondisclosure of facts relevant to application – whether submissions, evidence and transcripts should be referred to the Legal Services Commissioner COSTS – whether indemnity costs should be payable forthwith
Legislation: Australian Human Rights Commission Act 1986 (Cth) s 46PP Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 40.13
Cases cited: Bevillesta Pty Ltd v D Tannous No 2 Pty Ltd [2010] NSWCA 277 Coe v NSW Bar Association [2000] NSWCA 13 Fiduciary Ltd v Morningstar Research Pty Ltd [2002] NSWSC 432; (2002) 55 NSWLR 1 Legal Practitioners Complaints Committee v Dixon [2006] WASCA 27 McKellar v Container Terminal Management Services Ltd [1999] FCA 1639 Nichia Corporation v Arrow Electronics Australia Pty Ltd (No 2) [2015] FCA 824 Thunderdome Racetiming and Scoring Pty Ltd v Dorian Industries Pty Ltd [1992] FCA 423; (1992) 36 FCR 297
Date of hearing: 3, 5, 10, 12 and 30 May 2017
Registry: New South Wales
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 22
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr G J Hatcher SC with Mr M Seck
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate