Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Murray v Australian Community Pharmacy Authority [2017] FCA 705 File number: NSD 2023 of 2016
Judge: GRIFFITHS J
Date of judgment: 22 June 2017
Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – judicial review of the Australian Community Pharmacy Authority's recommendation to the Secretary of the Department of Health and Ageing that approval be granted under s 90 of the National Health Act 1953 (Cth) (Act) to supply pharmaceutical benefits at premises – judicial review of delegate's decision to grant the approval under s 90 of the Act – whether application was in respect of whole or part of premises Held – application dismissed with costs
Legislation: Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth) Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) s 39B Legislative Instruments Act 2003 (Cth) s 13 National Health Act 1953 (Cth) ss 4, 90, 99K, 99L National Health (Pharmaceutical Benefits) Regulations 1960 (Cth) reg 8 National Health (Australian Community Pharmacy Authority Rules) Determination 2011 ss 5, 6, 8, 10, 11, Sch 1, Sch 2
Cases cited: Walkerden v Wodonga Pharmacy Pty Ltd [2015] FCA 273; 230 FCR 243
Date of hearing: 19 June 2017
Registry: New South Wales
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 46
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate