Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Bui v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCA 714 Appeal from: Bui v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2016] FCCA 3347
File number: QUD 5 of 2017
Judge: REEVES J
Date of judgment: 23 June 2017
Catchwords: MIGRATION – appeal from a decision of the Federal Circuit Court – whether appellant lodged application for review to Tribunal within time limit set by s 347(1)(b) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – where appellant notified of the delegate's decision by notice sent to authorised recipient's email address – where filing of application with the Tribunal within the time limit a prerequisite for the Tribunal's jurisdiction – whether correspondence giving notice of change of authorised recipient's email address was dispatched under s 14 of the Electronics Transaction Act 1999 (Cth) or received under s 52(3) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – where the appellant failed to produce evidence that the correspondence had been dispatched or received Held: appeal dismissed
Legislation: Electronic Transactions Act 1999 (Cth) Migration Act 1958 (Cth) Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth)
Cases cited: Bui v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2015] FCCA 1931 Bui v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2016] FCCA 3347 Corporation of the City of Enfield v Development Assessment Commission 2000 (2000) 199 CLR 135; [2000] HCA 5 Fernando v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2000) 97 FCR 407; [2000] FCA 324 Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs v Singh (2000) 98 FCR 77; [2000] FCA 377 VEAN of 2002 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2003) 133 FCR 570; [2003] FCAFC 311 Xie v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCAFC 172
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate