Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Corbett v Corbett Court Pty Ltd, in the matter of Corbett Court Pty Ltd [2017] FCA 718 File number: NSD 1423 of 2012
Judge: GLEESON J
Date of judgment: 8 June 2017
Date of publication of reasons: 26 June 2017
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for release of the Home Office v Harman implied undertaking in relation to documents obtained under subpoenas – where release sought to enable use of the documents to defend proceedings in another court – where proceedings in another court contained allegations that were similar to allegations in these proceedings – where documents were obtained to defend similar allegations in the proceedings in this Court as those sought to be defended – where parties intend to apply for subpoenas to the same effect if application not granted – application granted
Cases cited: Binetter v BCI Finances Pty Ltd (in liq) [2015] FCAFC 122; (2015) 235 FCR 410 Corbett v Corbett Court Pty Limited, re Corbett Court Pty Limited [2015] FCA 1176; (2015) 109 ACSR 296 Eltran Pty Ltd v Westpac Banking Corporation (1990) 25 FCR 322; Harman v Secretary of State for the Home Department [1983] 1 AC 280; [1982] 2 WLR 338 Hearne v Street [2008] HCA 36; (2008) 235 CLR 125 Liberty Funding Pty Ltd v Phoenix Capital Ltd [2005] FCAFC 3; 218 ALR 283
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate