Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Director of Consumer Affairs Victoria v Daiso Industries (Australia) Pty Ltd (No 2) [2017] FCA 720 File number: VID 950 of 2016
Judge: MOSHINSKY J
Date of judgment: 23 June 2017
Catchwords: CONSUMER LAW – product safety of consumer goods – alleged contraventions of product safety standards – where disputed issue resolved adversely to respondent – where respondent otherwise admitted contraventions – application by the parties for the making of declarations in relation to admitted contraventions
Legislation: Australian Consumer Law and Fair Trading Act 2012 (Vic), Australian Consumer Law (Victoria), ss 106, 136 Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth), Sch 2, Australian Consumer Law, ss 106, 136 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), s 21
Cases cited: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Coles Supermarkets Australia Pty Ltd [2014] FCA 1405 Australian Securities and Investments Commission, in the matter of NSG Services Pty Ltd v NSG Services Pty Ltd [2017] FCA 345 Director of Consumer Affairs Victoria v Daiso Industries (Australia) Pty Ltd [2017] FCA 683
Date of hearing: 15 June 2017
Date of last submissions: 22 June 2017
Registry: Victoria
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: Regulator and Consumer Protection
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 10
Counsel for the Applicant: Ms H Symon QC with Mr S Bhojani
Solicitor for the Applicant: Solicitors to the Director of Consumer Affairs Victoria
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate