Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Royds v Royds, in the matter of Caloola Holdings Pty Ltd (in liq) [2017] FCA 731 File number: ACD 24 of 2010
Judge: GRIFFITHS J
Date of judgment: 30 June 2017
Catchwords: CORPORATIONS – appeal against rejection of part of a Proof of Debt or Claim upheld – Court approval of liquidator's claim for remuneration, subject to a deduction in respect of one matter having regard to the disproportionality between the fees charged and the value of the relevant asset
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ss 425, 449E, 473, 480, 504, 511 Corporations Amendment (Insolvency) Act 2007 (Cth) Corporations Regulations 2001 (Cth) s 5.6.54 Federal Court (Corporations) Rules 2000 (Cth) r 7.5
Cases cited: Dean-Wilcocks v Soluble Solution Hydroponics Pty Ltd (1997) 42 NSWLR 209 Re M F Global Australia Ltd (In Liq) [2012] NSWSC 994; 267 FLR 27 Sanderson as Liquidator of Sakr Nominees Pty Limited (in liquidation) v Sakr [2017] NSWCA 38 Templeton v Australian Securities and Investments Commission [2015] FCAFC 137; 108 ACSR 545 Warner, in the matter of GTL Tradeup Pty Ltd (in liq) [2015] FCA 323
Date of hearing: 22 June 2017
Registry: Australian Capital Territory
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate