Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Stanford v DePuy International Limited (No 7) [2017] FCA 748
File number: NSD 213 of 2011
Judge: WIGNEY J
Date of judgment: 28 June 2017
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – representative proceeding– settlement distribution scheme for group members previously approved by Court – application by joint administrators of settlement scheme for Court approval of payment of administration costs – whether costs and disbursements incurred reasonable
Cases cited: Courtney v Medtel Pty Limited (No. 5) [2004] FCA 1406 Foley v Gay [2016] FCA 273 Modtech Engineering Pty Ltd v GPT Management Holdings Limited [2013] FCA 626 Re Medforce Healthcare Services Limited in liq [2001] 3 NZLR 145 Rowe v Ausnet Electricity Services Proprietary Limited (Ruling No. 7) [2016] VSC 424
Date of hearing: 14, 28 June 2017
Registry: New South Wales
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: Regulator and Consumer Protection
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 29
Counsel for the First Applicant: The First Applicant did not appear
Counsel for the Second Applicant: The Second Applicant did not appear
Counsel for the Third Applicant: Ms Z M Hillman
Solicitors for the Third Applicant: Maurice Blackburn Lawyers and Shine Lawyers
Solicitor for the Respondents: Mr T Biddle of Norton Rose Fulbright
ORDERS NSD 213 of 2011
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate