Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Re. Group Pty Ltd v Kazal (No 3) [2017] FCA 754 File number: NSD 2080 of 2016
Judge: PERRAM J
Date of judgment: 4 July 2017
Catchwords: CONTEMPT OF COURT – where Second Respondent allegedly failed to comply with mandatory orders by publishing certain representations on his website and by failing to remove certain photographs from that website – whether terms of orders ambiguous – whether no-case submission successful
Legislation: Copyright Act 1968 (Cth ss 10, 31(1)(b), 36(1) Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) s 136
Cases cited: Athens v Randwick City Council [2005] NSWCA 317 (2005) 64 NSWLR 58 Commodore Business Machines Pty Ltd v Trade Practices Commission [1990] FCA 77; (1990) 92 ALR 563 Dow Jones and Company Inc v Gutnick [2002] HCA 56; (2002) 210 CLR 575 May v O'Sullivan [1995] HCA 38; (1955) 92 CLR 654 Microsoft Corporation v Marks (No 1) [1996] FCA 709; (1996) 69 FCR 117 Re.Group Pty Ltd v Kazal [2016] FCA 1485 Universal Music v Sharman Networks [2006] FCAFC 41; (2006) 150 FCR 110 Witham v Holloway [1995] HCA 3; (1995) 183 CLR 525
Date of hearing: 21-22 June 2017
Registry: New South Wales
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Intellectual Property
Sub-area: Copyright and Industrial Designs
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 98
Counsel for the Applicants: Mr A Leopold SC with Mr R Jedrzejczyk
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate