Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Eggerth v Piccardi [2017] FCA 773 File number(s): NSD 437 of 2015
Judge(s): DERRINGTON J
Date of judgment: 1 June 2017
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Application to vacate trial dates – time needed by the applicant to reformulate claim
Cases cited: Aon Risk Services Australia Ltd v Australian National University (2009) 239 CLR 175
Date of hearing: 1 June 2017
Registry: New South Wales
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: Commercial Contracts, Banking, Finance and Insurance
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 3
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr D B O'Sullivan QC and Mr AC Stumer
Solicitor for the Applicant: Trisley Lawyers
Counsel for the First, Second, Third and Fourth Respondents: Mr Cooper QC and Mr A Christie
Solicitor for the First, Second, Third and Fourth Respondents: Aitken Whyte Lawyers Pty Ltd
ORDERS NSD 437 of 2015
BETWEEN: THEODOR EGGERTH Applicant
AND: KURT PICCARDI First Respondent
GERLINDE PICCARDI Second Respondent
KURT ANTHONY PICCARDI (and another named in the Schedule) Third Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate