Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Hardy v Reckitt Benckiser (Australia) Pty Limited (No 2) [2017] FCA 785 File number: NSD 273 of 2016
Judge: NICHOLAS J
Date of judgment: 11 July 2017
Date of publication of reasons: 12 July 2017
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) Pt IVA Australian Consumer Law ss 18, 33, 54, 56, 59, 236, 271, 272
Date of hearing: 11 July 2017
Registry: New South Wales
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: Regulator and Consumer Protection
Category: No catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 31
Counsel for the Applicants: Mr R White
Solicitor for the Applicants: Bannister Law
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr SA Lawrence appears with Mr DE Birch
Solicitor for the Respondent: Allen & Overy
ORDERS NSD 273 of 2016
BETWEEN: Keith George Hardy First Applicant
YASMINKA JANG Second Applicant
AND: RECKITT BENCKISER (AUSTRALIA) PTY LIMITED Respondent
JUDGE: NICHOLAS J DATE OF ORDER: 11 July 2017
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The applicants' interlocutory application dated 29 June 2017 be dismissed. 2. The applicants pay the respondent's costs of the interlocutory application. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
ORDERS NSD 273 of 2016
BETWEEN: Keith George Hardy First Applicant
YASMINKA JANG Second Applicant
AND: RECKITT BENCKISER (AUSTRALIA) PTY LIMITED Respondent
JUDGE: NICHOLAS J DATE OF ORDER: 11 July 2017
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate