Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Ltd v Allam [2017] FCA 812 File number: NSD 314 of 2016
Judge(s): PERRAM J
Date of judgment: 21 July 2017
Catchwords: COSTS – where costs orders made by High Court in favour of First and Sixth Respondents against Applicant – where certificate of taxation issued – where solicitors for Respondents assert lien over judgment debt – whether principles of set-off apply to prevent enforcement of costs orders where other costs orders in Applicant's favour exceed amounts to which Respondents are entitled in certificate of taxation PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for enforcement of costs orders made by High Court in favour of First and Sixth Respondents against Applicant – writ for levy of property – garnishee order – application for injunction prohibiting Respondents from enforcing costs order – whether injunction should issue in circumstances
Legislation: Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) s 136 Personal Property Securities Act 2009 (Cth) s 8(1)(c) High Court Rules 2004 (Cth) r 57.05.4
Cases cited: Allam v Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Ltd [2012] FCAFC 34; (2012) 95 IPR 242 Akki Pty Ltd v Martin Hall Pty Ltd (1994) 35 NSWLR 470 Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Ltd v Allam [2016] HCA 3 Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Ltd v Global Gaming Supplies Pty Ltd [2013] HCA 21; (2013) 297 ALR 406 Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Ltd v Global Gaming Supplies Pty Ltd (No. 2) [2010] FCA 277 Australian Beverage Distributors v Evans & Tate Premium Wines Pty Ltd [2006] NSWSC 560; (2006) 200 FLR 332 Brookes v Harris [1995] 1 WLR 918 Cade Pty Ltd v Thomson Simmins (No. 2) [2000] SASC 369 Currie v The Law Society [1977] QB 990 Ex parte Patience; Makinson v The Minister (1940) 40 SR (NSW) 96 Flinn v Flinn [1999] 3 VR 712 Lahoud v Lahoud [2012] NSWSC 284 Lockley v National Blood Transfusion Service [1992] 1 WLR 492 Miller v Director of Public Prosecutions (No. 2) [2004] NSWCA 249 Puddephatt v Leith (No.2) [1916] 2 Ch 168 Sivritas v Sivritas [2008] VSC 374; (2008) 23 VR 349 State of New South Wales v Hamod [2011] NSWCA 376 Team Dynamik Racing Pty Ltd v Longhurst Racing Pty Ltd [2008] QSC 36 Wentworth v Wentworth (Unreported, Supreme Court of New South Wales, Young J, 12 December 1994) Worrell v Power (1993) 46 FCR 214
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate