Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Pappin on behalf of the Muthi Muthi People v Attorney-General of New South Wales [2017] FCA 817 File number: NSD 1248 of 2014
Judge: GRIFFITHS J
Date of judgment: 18 July 2017
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application to set aside notice to produce relating to report prepared by research consultants for second respondent – whether second respondent, in retaining the research services of a consultant, was acting as principal or agent of applicant – whether any legal professional privilege in the report would be the privilege of the second respondent Held: notice to produce set aside
Legislation: Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) ss 203BB, 203FE, 203FEA
Cases cited: Commissioner of Australian Federal Police v Propend Finance Pty Limited [1997] HCA 3; 188 CLR 501
Date of hearing: 18 July 2017
Registry: New South Wales
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Native Title
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 15
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr Pappin appeared in person on behalf of the applicant
Counsel for the First Respondent: Mr M Hill
Solicitor for the First Respondent: Crown Solicitors Office
Counsel for the Second Respondent: Mr J Waters
ORDERS NSD 1248 of 2014
BETWEEN: GARY PAPPIN AND JEAN CHARLES ON BEHALF OF THE MUTHI MUTHI PEOPLE Applicant
AND: ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW SOUTH WALES First Respondent
NTSCORP LIMITED Second Respondent
JUDGE: GRIFFITHS J DATE OF ORDER: 18 JULY 2017
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate