Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Kirunda v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Force (No 2) [2017] FCA 824 File number: NSD 1393 of 2016
Judge: GRIFFITHS J
Date of judgment: 21 July 2017
Catchwords: COSTS – whether or not costs should follow the outcome of the substantive proceeding – whether any conduct by respondent or any overarching public interest consideration warrants departure from normal rule – respondent belatedly seeks lump sum costs order Held: applicant to pay respondent's costs, with the question of lump sum costs subject to further submissions by parties
Legislation: Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 40.02
Cases cited: Kirunda v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Force [2017] FCA 735
Date of hearing: Heard on the papers
Date of last submissions: 19 July 2017
Registry: New South Wales
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 10
Counsel for the Applicant: The applicant appeared in person
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr M Seck
Solicitor for the Respondent: Minter Ellison
ORDERS NSD 1393 of 2016
BETWEEN: BILL WILLIAM KIRUNDA Applicant
AND: COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, NEW SOUTH WALES POLICE FORCE Respondent
JUDGE: GRIFFITHS J DATE OF ORDER: 21 JULY 2017
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The applicant is to pay the respondent's costs of and incidental to the interlocutory application filed on 2 December 2016. 2. The respondent is to file and serve an affidavit specifying the lump sum amount it seeks and the justification for that amount, together with a brief written submission not to exceed 3 pages in length, on or before 5pm on 28 July 2017. 3. The applicant is to file and serve any affidavit in response, together with a brief written submission not to exceed 5 pages in length, as to whether or not a lump sum costs order should be made and, in the event that a lump sum costs order is made, in what amount, on or before 5pm on 11 August 2017. 4. Finalisation of the costs order will be determined on the papers and without an oral hearing. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate