Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Selth v Australasian Barrister Chambers Pty Ltd (No 4) [2017] FCA 855 File number(s): NSD 975 of 2014 NSD 1019 of 2014
Judge(s): GREENWOOD J
Date of judgment: 28 July 2017
Catchwords: INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY – consideration of the disposition of the costs of and incidental to the proceedings
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), s 43
Cases cited: Foots v Southern Cross Mine Management Pty Ltd (2007) 234 CLR 52 Kazar v Kargarian (2011) 197 FCR 113 Oshlack v Richmond River Council (1998) 193 CLR 72 Selth v Australasian Barrister Chambers Pty Ltd (No 3) [2017] FCA 649
Date of hearing: 1 February 2016 to 5 February 2016
Date of last submissions: 3 July 2017
Registry: New South Wales
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Intellectual Property
Sub-area: Trade Marks
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 20
Counsel for the Applicants: Mr R Macaw QC with Mr M O'Meara
Solicitor for the Applicants: Mr A Christopher, Webb Henderson
Counsel for the Respondents: Mr D Minus
ORDERS NSD 975 of 2014
BETWEEN: PHILIP SELTH IN A REPRESENTATIVE CAPACITY FOR THE MEMBERS OF THE AUSTRALIAN BAR ASSOCIATION First Applicant
ABA AUSTRALIAN BAR ASSOCIATION LIMITED ACN 605 949 148 Second Applicant
AND: AUSTRALASIAN BARRISTER CHAMBERS PTY LTD ACN 133 736 848 First Respondent
DEREK MICHAEL MINUS Second Respondent
DISPUTE RESOLUTION ASSOCIATES PTY LTD ACN 090 594 451 (and another named in the Schedule) Third Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate