Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
REA Group Limited v Fairfax Media Limited (No 2) [2017] FCA 884 File number: VID 144 of 2016
Judge: MURPHY J
Date of judgment: 14 June 2017
Catchwords: COMPETITION – declarations – injunctive relief – corrective advertising COSTS – indemnity costs – apportionment of costs
Legislation: Australian Consumer Law s 232 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 21
Cases cited: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v On Clinic Australia Pty Ltd (1996) 35 IPR 635 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Real Estate Institute of Western Australia Inc (1999) 95 FCR 114 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Virgin Mobile Australia Pty Ltd (No 2) [2002] FCA 1548 Bowen Investments Pty Ltd v Tabcorp Holdings Ltd (No 2) [2008] FCAFC 107 Cretazzo v Lombardi (1975) 13 SASR 4 Dodds Family Investments Pty Ltd v Lane Industries Pty Ltd (1993) 26 IPR 261 Hughes v Western Australia Cricket Association (Inc) [1986] ATPR 40-748 Medical Benefits Fund of Australia Ltd v Cassidy (2003) 135 FCR 1
Date of hearing: 14 June 2017
Registry: Victoria
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: Regulator and Consumer Protection
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 32
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr W Houghton QC and Mr S Rebikoff
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate