Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Rodgers Reidy (Qld) Pty Limited v Google Australia Pty Limited (No 2) [2017] FCA 903 File number: NSD 126 of 2017
Judge: BROMWICH J
Date of judgment: 9 August 2017
Catchwords: COSTS – consideration of competing applications for costs of urgent application – where proceedings commenced with little notice – whether first respondent properly joined as a party
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), ss 37M, 37N, 37P
Cases cited: Google Inc v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2013] HCA 1; 249 CLR 435
Date of hearing: Determined on the papers
Date of last submissions: 5 April 2017
Registry: New South Wales
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: Commercial Contracts, Banking, Finance and Insurance
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 43
Counsel for the Applicants: Ms E Holmes
Solicitor for the Applicants: Polcynski Lawyers
Counsel for the First Respondent: Mr C Dimitriadis SC
Solicitor for the First Respondent: Allens
ORDERS NSD 126 of 2017
BETWEEN: RODGERS REIDY (QLD) PTY LIMITED ACN 117 655 973 First Applicant
RODGERS REIDY (NSW) PTY LIMITED ACN 089 898 813 Second Applicant
RODGERS REIDY (VIC) PTY LIMITED ACN 112 011 321 Third Applicant RODGERS REIDY (INTERNATIONAL) PTY LIMITED ACN 124 647 696 Fourth Applicant
AND: GOOGLE AUSTRALIA PTY LIMITED ACN 102 417 032 First Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate