Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
AIN17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCA 907 File number: WAD 161 of 2017
Judge: BARKER J
Date of judgment: 8 August 2017
Catchwords: MIGRATION – application for review of decision not to revoke decision to mandatorily cancel applicant's visa – visa cancellation decision made under s 501(3A) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – whether Minister fell into jurisdictional error – where applicant faces indefinite detention
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 476, 501, 501(3A), 501(6), 501(7), 501CA, 501CA(3), 501CA(4)(b)(i)
Cases cited: Al Kateb v Godwin (2004) 219 CLR 562; [2004] HCA 37 AUK15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCA 938 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Tesic [2017] FCAFC 83 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Li (2013) 249 CLR 332; [2013] HCA 18 NBMZ v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2014) 220 FCR 1; [2014] FCAFC 38 Tesic v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCA 1465 Tupkovic v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCA 73
Date of hearing: 27 July 2017
Registry: Western Australia
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 58
Counsel for the Applicant: The Applicant was self-represented
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate