Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Migdadi v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCA 928 Appeal from: Application for extension of time and leave to appeal: Migdadi v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection & Anor [2016] FCCA 2695
File number: NSD 1924 of 2016
Judge: BURLEY J
Date of judgment: 16 August 2017
Catchwords: MIGRATION – application for Partner (Temporary) (Class UK) visa – application dismissed by primary judge pursuant to r 44.12 of Federal Circuit Court Rules 2001 (Cth) – application for extension of time and leave to appeal – whether draft grounds of appeal are reasonably arguable – application dismissed
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 24 Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 5F, 359A Federal Circuit Court Rules 2001 (Cth) r 44.12 Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) reg 1.15A
Cases cited: Décor Corporation Pty Ltd v Dart Industries Inc [1991] FCA 844; (1991) 33 FCR 397 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZIAI [2009] HCA 39; (2009) ALJR 1123
Date of hearing: 2 March 2017
Registry: New South Wales
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 33
Counsel for the Applicant: The Applicant appeared in person.
Solicitor for the First Respondent: Ms B Rayment of Mills Oakley
Counsel for the Second Respondent: The Second Respondent filed a submitting appearance, save as to costs
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate