Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Reaper v Luxton [2017] FCA 949
File number: VID 289 of 2017
Judge: O'CALLAGHAN J
Date of judgment: 21 August 2017
Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – application for review of Deputy District Registrar's decision pursuant to r 2.26 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) to refuse to accept documents for filing – where Deputy District Registrar formed the view that documents were an abuse of process – whether Deputy District Registrar took into account irrelevant considerations – whether decision was legally unreasonable
Legislation: Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth), s 5 Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth), s 178(1) and (2) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth), rr 2.26, 26.01
Cases cited: Bizuneh v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2003) 128 FCR 353 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Stretton (2016) 237 FCR 1 Paramasivam v Randwick City Council [2005] FCA 369 Rahman v Hedge [2012] FCA 68 Satchithanantham v National Australia Bank Ltd [2009] FCA 1171; 260 ALR 567 Satchithanantham v National Australia Bank Ltd [2010] FCAFC 47; 268 ALR 222 Shaw v Buljan [2016] FCA 829 SZVCP v Cho [2017] FCA 310 Date of hearing: 21 April 2017
Registry: Victoria
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 37
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate