Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Jones v Treasury Wine Estates Limited (No 3) [2017] FCA 961 File number: NSD 660 of 2014
Judge: FOSTER J
Date of Orders: 17 July 2017
Date of publication of Reasons: 18 August 2017
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – whether the evidence of a witness ordinarily resident in the USA should be given by video link – application opposed – application dismissed with costs
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), s 47A(1), s 47C(1) Federal Court Rules 2011, r 5.04(3), item 27
Cases cited: Jones v Treasury Wine Estates Limited (No 2) [2017] FCA 296 Campaign Master (UK) Ltd v Forty Two International Pty Ltd (No 3) (2009) 181 FCR 152 Kirby v Centro Properties Ltd (2012) 288 ALR 601 Traxys Europe SA v Balaji Coke Industry Pvt Ltd (No 4) [2012] FCA 1416 Unilever Australia Ltd v Revlon Australia Pty Ltd (No 4) [2014] FCA 1074
Date of hearing: 17 July 2017
Registry: New South Wales
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: Corporations and Corporate Insolvency
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 51
Counsel for the Plaintiff: Mr J Stoljar SC and Mr G Donnellan
Solicitor for the Plaintiff: Maurice Blackburn
Counsel for the Defendant: Mr RA Dick SC and Mr AM Hochroth
Solicitor for the Defendant: Herbert Smith Freehills
ORDERS NSD 660 of 2014
BETWEEN: BRIAN JONES Plaintiff
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate