Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Bis Industries Limited v Dale (No 2) [2017] FCA 972 Appeal from: Dale v Bis Industries Limited (Compensation) [2016] AATA 862
File number: QUD 887 of 2016
Judge: RANGIAH J
Date of judgment: 18 August 2017
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – costs – discretion to award costs – departure from usual rule that successful litigant is awarded costs in their favour
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 43(3) Safety, Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 1988 (Cth) s 19
Cases cited: Bis Industries Limited v Dale [2017] FCA 789 Bullock v The Federated Furnishing Trades Society of Australasia (No 2) (1985) 5 FCR 476 Oshlack v Richmond River Council (1998) 193 CLR 72 Ruddock v Vadarlis (No 2) (2001) 115 FCR 229 Summers v Repatriation Commission (No 2) [2015] FCAFC 64
Date of hearing: Determined on the papers
Date of last submissions: 24 July 2017 (Applicant) 7 August 2017 (Respondent) 14 August 2017 (Applicant in Reply to Respondent's Submission of 7 August 2017)
Registry: Queensland
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 12
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr PG Woulfe
Solicitor for the Applicant: HBA Legal
Counsel for the Respondent: Ms J Sorbello
Solicitor for the Respondent: Morton & Morton
ORDERS QUD 887 of 2016
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate