Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Namilakonda v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCA 987 Appeal from: Namilakonda v Minister for Immigration [2016] FCCA 2931
File number: VID 1303 of 2016
Judge: ROBERTSON J
Date of judgment: 22 August 2017
Catchwords: MIGRATION – appeal from the Federal Circuit Court of Australia – whether any error by the primary judge in concluding that there was no jurisdictional error by the then Migration Review Tribunal in not being satisfied that the applicant intended genuinely to stay in Australia temporarily for the purposes of cl 572.223(1)(a) of Sch 2 to the Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) as then in force – no appearance by the appellant at the hearing of the appeal
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s 65 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 36.75(1)(a)(i) Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) Sch 2, cl 572.223
Date of hearing: 22 August 2017
Registry: Victoria
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 22
Counsel for the Appellant: The Appellant did not appear
Solicitor for the First Respondent: Mr O Young of Sparke Helmore Lawyers
Counsel for the Second Respondent: The Second Respondent submitted save as to costs
ORDERS VID 1303 of 2016
BETWEEN: DEVARAJU NAMILAKONDA Appellant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND BORDER PROTECTION First Respondent
ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL Second Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate