Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Bornecrantz v Secretary, Department of Social Services [2017] FCA 1010 Appeal from: Bornecrantz v Secretary, Department of Social Services [2015] AATA 814
File number: NSD 1470 of 2015
Judge: PERRY J
Date of judgment: 29 August 2017
Catchwords: SOCIAL SECURITY – Appeal on question of law against decision of Administrative Appeals Tribunal to affirm decision cancelling applicant's age pension – where Tribunal found applicant's and his wife's combined asset value exceeded limit for eligibility to receive age pension under the Social Security Act 1991 (Cth) – where loan to company included in combined asset value but no account taken of company's liability to repay loan in attributing value of company assets to the applicant under section 1208E - whether Tribunal's decision unreasonable because assets (company loans) were counted twice in calculating combined asset value – where combined asset value artificially inflated due to 'double counting' – whether Tribunal failed to have regard to a relevant consideration, being the outcome of applying s 1208E(1) in the particular case – appeal allowed
Legislation: Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth), s 44 Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth), s 78B Social Security Act 1991 (Cth), ss 1207X, 1207Q, 2017N, 1208E, 1208H, 1208E Social Security and Veterans' Entitlements Legislation Amendment (Private Trusts and Private Companies – Integrity of Means Testing) Act 2000 (Cth) Explanatory Memorandum to the Social Security and Veterans' Entitlements Legislation Amendment (Private Trusts and Private Companies – Integrity of Means Testing) Bill 2000 Social Security (Attribution of Assets) Principles 2001 (Cth)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate