Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SZWBK v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCA 1020 Appeal from: SZWBK & Ors v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2017] FCCA 434
File number: NSD 419 of 2017
Judge: LEE J
Date of judgment: 4 August 2017
Catchwords: MIGRATION – application for judicial review of refusal to grant Protection (Class XA) Visa – application dismissed in the Federal Circuit Court of Australia – appeal from primary judge's decision PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application pursuant to r 36.75(1)(a)(i) of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) to dismiss an appeal in the absence of the appellants – where application for adjournment on medical grounds made by the first appellant by letter sent to the Court on the morning of the appeal – where medical evidence unsatisfactory – where application for adjournment dismissed – where appeal does not have reasonable prospects of success – appeal dismissed with costs
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth), ss 36(2)(a), 36(2)(aa), 36(2B)(a) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth), rr 36.75(1)(a)(i), 36.75(2) Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees, opened for signature 28 July 1951, 189 UNTS 137 (entered into force 22 April 1954) Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees, opened for signature 31 January 1967, 606 UNTS 267 (entered into force 4 October 1967)
Cases cited: ALG15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCA 560 MZYEZ v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2010] FCA 530 NAKX v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 1559 Singh v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCA 108 SZATV v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2007] HCA 40; (2007) 233 CLR 18 SZWBK & Ors v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2017] FCCA 434
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate