Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Oze-Igiehon v Uber Technology Inc [2017] FCA 1024 File number(s): WAD 216 of 2017
Judge(s): GILMOUR J
Date of judgment: 31 August 2017
Catchwords: SUPERANNUATION – superannuation guarantee scheme – liability for superannuation guarantee charge – consideration of who has standing to make a claim for proper superannuation guarantee payments PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application to amend addresses of service to overseas addresses – application to join the Commissioner of Taxation and Fair Work Ombudsman as third parties to the proceedings
Legislation: Superannuation Guarantee (Administration) Act 1992 (Cth) ss 12, 15B, 16, 17, 19 and 43 Superannuation Guarantee Charge Act 1992 (Cth) ss 3 and 5 Taxation Administration Act 1953 (Cth) sch 1, ss 250-10(2), 255-1, 255-5(1) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 13.01(1)(a), 26.01(b), (c) and (d)
Cases cited: Kronen v Federal Commission of Taxation (2012) 213 FCR 495 Roy Morgan Research Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation [2010] FCAFC 52 Shaddock v Cockburn Cement Ltd [2004] WAIRC 11726
Date of hearing: 11 August 2017
Registry: Western Australia
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Employment & Industrial Relations
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 27
Counsel for the Applicant: The applicant appeared in person
Counsel for the Respondents: Ms RJ Lee
Solicitor for the Respondents: DLA Piper
ORDERS WAD 216 of 2017
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate