Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Le v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCA 1053
File number(s): QUD 682 of 2016
Judge(s): GREENWOOD J
Date of judgment: 5 September 2017
Catchwords: MIGRATION – consideration of an application for an extension of time for the filing of a notice of appeal – consideration of aspects of the merits of the grounds of appeal sought to be relied upon having regard to the extensive argument put on by the parties in relation to that question
Legislation: Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth), Reg 1.15AA(1)
Cases cited: Kalanje v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2006] FCA 1618 Naidu v Minister for Immigration (2004) 140 FCR 284
Date of hearing: 24 November 2016
Date of last submissions: 24 November 2016
Registry: Queensland
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 62
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr P Unantenna
Solicitor for the Applicant: Essen Lawyers
Counsel for the Respondents: Mr B McGlade
Solicitor for the Respondents: Clayton Utz
ORDERS QUD 682 of 2016
BETWEEN: THI TANG HONG LE Applicant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND BORDER PROTECTION First Respondent
ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL Second Respondent
JUDGE: GREENWOOD J DATE OF ORDER: 5 SEPTEMBER 2017
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The applicant is granted an extension of time pursuant to r 36.05 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 for the filing of the notice of appeal filed on 30 August 2016. 2. The first respondent pay the applicant's costs of and incidental to the application. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate