Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
ACE15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCA 1054 Appeal from: ACE15 v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2016] FCCA 2939
File number: VID 1442 of 2016
Judge: BROMBERG J
Date of judgment: 5 September 2017
Catchwords: MIGRATION – Protection (Class XA) visa – whether the primary judge erred in not finding that the Tribunal committed jurisdictional error – where the appellant's circumstances raised the prospect that he would be prosecuted under the Immigrants and Emigrants Act (Sri Lanka) – where the Tribunal found that the appellant would be fined and that he would be able to pay any fine – whether the Tribunal constructively failed to consider the claim by virtue of failing to take account of evidence that the appellant's family's financial circumstances had fundamentally changed – consideration of Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v MZYTS (2013) 230 FCR 431 – the Tribunal's failure was not so grave as to amount to jurisdictional error – whether the Tribunal's finding that the appellant could pay the fine was illogical or irrational – the Tribunal's finding was made according to a logical process of reasoning – whether the Tribunal failed to accord procedural fairness under s 425 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – the relevant "issue" was identified by the Tribunal as being whether the imposition of a fine would amount to significant harm – the appellant had notice of, and opportunity to present submissions and evidence on, the issue – appeal dismissed
Legislation: Aboriginal Land Rights (Northern Territory) Act 1976 (Cth) Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 65, 425, 474
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate