Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SZMTA v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCA 1055 Appeal from: SZMTA v Minister for Immigration [2016] FCCA 1329
File number: NSD 978 of 2016
Judge: WHITE J
Date of judgment: 5 September 2017
Catchwords: MIGRATION – visa – application for complementary protection under Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s 36(2)(aa) – application refused by Minister – refusal affirmed by Administrative Appeals Tribunal – unsuccessful judicial review of Tribunal decision in Federal Circuit Court (FCC) – appeal from FCC decision – whether Tribunal decision affected by jurisdictional error because of failure to take into account the appellant's health and mental state – Tribunal member accepted and relied upon evidence of health and mental state – no jurisdictional error established. MIGRATION – whether inconsistency in Tribunal's regard to appellant's mental state when assessing credibility issues – the Tribunal's reasons not unreasonable, irrational, nor illogical MIGRATION – Minister's delegate gave a notification to Refugee Review Tribunal under Migration Act s 438(1)(b) that certain materials should not be disclosed to the appellant because they had been given to the Minister or the Department in confidence– in fact all the materials listed in the notification had previously been disclosed to appellant's then solicitors – whether jurisdictional error in procedure adopted in relation to notification – notification mistaken as it referred to documents and information which could not reasonably be regarded to have been given in confidence – inference that Tribunal relied on the mistaken notification and thereby committed jurisdictional error – appeal allowed.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate