Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Peterson on behalf of the Wunna Nyiyaparli People v State of Western Australia [2017] FCA 1056 Appeal from: Peterson on behalf of the Wunna Nyiyaparli v State of Western Australia [2016] FCA 1528
File number: WAD 17 of 2017
Judge: MCKERRACHER J
Date of judgment: 5 September 2017
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – whether notice of appeal authorised by the appellant – whether appeal authorised by all persons comprising the appellant – whether leave to appeal is required – where appeal is brought against a number of orders some of which are final and some of which are interlocutory – whether leave to appeal should be granted – whether primary decision attended with sufficient doubt to warrant appeal – whether substantial injustice would occur if leave refused
Legislation: Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) s 62A Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 24(1A), 24(1AA)(b)(i), 24(a), 25(2B) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 1.61(4), 1.61(5), 26.72(1)
Cases cited: Computer Edge Pty Ltd v Apple Computer Inc (1984) 54 ALR 767 Damorgold Pty Ltd v J.A.I. Products Pty Ltd [2014] FCA 448 Decor Corp Pty Ltd v Dart Industries Inc (1991) 33 FCR 397 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499 McGlade v Native Title Registrar (2017) 340 ALR 419 N and E Bowder Pty Ltd v Australian Keg Company Pty Ltd (2014) 220 FCR 166 Roe v Kimberley Land Council Aboriginal Corporation (2010) 215 FCR 131 Wyman v Queensland (2015) 235 FCR 464
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate