Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Securities and Investments Commission v One Tech Media Limited [2017] FCA 1080 File number: VID 848 of 2016
Judge: MOSHINSKY J
Date of judgment: 6 September 2017
Catchwords: DISCOVERY – application for discovery in connection with contempt of court application – where contempt charges brought against certain parties to the proceeding and a firm of solicitors acting for the parties – where discovery sought from corporate parties and the firm of solicitors – whether firm of solicitors had waived privilege against exposure to penalty
Legislation: Australian Securities and Investments Act 2001 (Cth), s 19 Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), ss 1323, 1324 Evidence Act 1995 (Cth), s 187 Federal Court Rules 2011, rr 20.14, 20.15
Cases cited: Attorney General v Punch Ltd [2003] 1 AC 1046 Attorney-General v Times Newspapers Ltd [1992] 1 AC 191 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Prysmian Cavi E Sistemi Energia SRL (No 10) (2015) 235 FCR 593 Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v Boral Resources (Vic) Pty Ltd (2015) 256 CLR 375 CSL Australia Pty Ltd v Maritime Union of Australia [2016] FCA 1141 Daniels Corporation International Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (2002) 213 CLR 543 Ewin v Vergara (No 2) (2012) 209 FCR 288 Mann v Carnell (1999) 201 CLR 1 Zhu v Treasurer of the State of New South Wales (2004) 218 CLR 530
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate