Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Re. Group Pty Ltd v Kazal (No 4) [2017] FCA 1084 File number: NSD 2080 of 2016
Judge: PERRAM J
Date of judgment: 25 September 2017
Catchwords: CONTEMPT OF COURT – where Second Respondent allegedly failed to comply with mandatory orders by publishing certain representations and photographs on his website and by failing to remove them from that website –whether terms of orders ambiguous – whether terms of orders breached – whether Second Respondent in contempt of court
Legislation: Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) ss 10, 31(1)(b)(iii), 35(2), 36(1)
Cases cited: Advan Investments Pty Ltd v Gleeson Motor Sales Pty Ltd [2003] VSC 201 Australasian Meat Industry Employees' Union v Mudginberri Station Pty Ltd [1986] HCA 46; (1986) 161 CLR 98 Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v Grocon Constructors (Victoria) Pty Ltd [2014] VSCA 261; (2014) 47 VR 527 Dyers v The Queen [2002] HCA 45; (2002) 210 CLR 285 Hearne v Street [2008] HCA 36; (2008) 235 CLR 125 Jones v Dunkel [1959] HCA 8; (1959) 101 CLR 298 Kazal v Thunder Studios Inc (California) [2017] FCA 111 Re.Group Ltd v Kazal (No 3) [2017] FCA 754
Date of hearing: 11 July 2017
Date of last submissions: 8 August 2017 (Applicants) 21 August 2017 (Respondents)
Registry: New South Wales
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Intellectual Property
Sub-area: Copyright and Industrial Designs
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate