Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Hillbrick Bicycles Pty Ltd v F45 Training Pty Ltd [2017] FCA 1089 File number: QUD 8 of 2017
Judge: REEVES J
Date of judgment: 12 September 2017
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for security for costs under s 56 of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) and rule 19.01 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) – whether an order for security for costs should be made against a natural person – whether an order for security for costs should be made against a third party who stands to benefit from the proceeding
Legislation: Australian Consumer Law (Schedule 2 to the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth)) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth)
Cases cited: Barton v Minister for Foreign Affairs (1984) 2 FCR 463 Chang v Comcare Australia [1999] FCA 1677 Commissioner of Taxation v Vasiliades [2016] FCAFC 170 Cunningham v Olliver (Federal Court of Australia, unreported, Burchett J, 21 November 1994) Knight v Beyond Properties Pty Ltd [2005] FCA 764 Logue v Hansen Technologies Ltd (2003) 125 FCR 590; [2003] FCA 81 Melville v Craig Nowlan & Associates Pty Ltd (2002) 54 NSWLR 82; [2002] NSWCA 32 Morris v Hanley [2000] NSWSC 957 Sheather v Staples Waste Removals Pty Ltd [2012] FCA 998
Date of hearing: 28 July 2017
Registry: Queensland
Division: General Division
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate