Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
F.Y.D Investments Pty Ltd v Promptair Pty Ltd [2017] FCA 1097 File number: SAD 391 of 2015
Judge: WHITE J
Date of judgment: 15 September 2017
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application to reopen a case – judgment reserved but not delivered – Applicants wish to lead further evidence and to make submissions – oversight of counsel at trial – whether in the interests of justice to grant application – application allowed.
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 37M, 37N
Cases cited: Bartley v Myers [2002] SASC 24; (2002) 83 SASR 183 Brown v Petranker (1991) 22 NSWLR 717 Harrington-Smith (on behalf of the Wongatha People) v Western Australia (No 8) [2004] FCA 338; (2004) 207 ALR 483 Inspector-General in Bankruptcy v Bradshaw [2006] FCA 22 LED Builders Pty Ltd v Eagle Homes Pty Ltd [1999] FCA 1141 Monroe Schneider Associates (Inc) v No 1 Raberem Pty Ltd (1991) 33 FCR 1 Urban Transport Authority of NSW v Nweiser (1992) 28 NSWLR 471 Walsh v Greater Metropolitan Cemeteries Trust (No 2) [2014] FCA 456; (2014) 243 IR 468
Date of hearing: 11 August 2017
Registry: South Australia
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: Commercial Contracts, Banking, Finance and Insurance
Category: Catchwords
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate