Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Hells Angels Motorcycle Corporation (Australia) Pty Limited v Redbubble Limited [2017] FCA 1109 File number(s): QUD 902 of 2015
Judge(s): GREENWOOD J
Date of judgment: 19 September 2017
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – consideration of the basis upon which an application for security for costs made late in the day ought not to be entertained by the Court and ought to be dismissed
Date of hearing: 15 September 2017
Date of last submissions: 15 September 2017
Registry: Queensland
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Intellectual Property
Sub-area: Copyright and Industrial Designs
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 17
Counsel for the Applicant/Cross Respondent: Mr D Eliades
Solicitor for the Applicant/Cross Respondent: Solus IP Pty Ltd
Counsel for the First Respondent/Cross Claimant: Mr R Cobden SC
Solicitor for the First Respondent/Cross Claimant: Allens Linklaters
ORDERS QUD 902 of 2015
BETWEEN: HELLS ANGELS MOTORCYCLE CORPORATION (AUSTRALIA) PTY LIMITED ACN 123 059 745 Applicant
AND: REDBUBBLE LIMITED ACN 119 200 592 First Respondent
HELLS ANGELS MOTORCYCLE CORPORATION Second Respondent
AND BETWEEN: REDBUBBLE LIMITED ACN 119 200 592 Cross-Claimant
AND: HELLS ANGELS MOTORCYCLE CORPORATION Cross-Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate