Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Changshu Longte Grinding Ball Co., Ltd v Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister for Industry, Innovation and Science (No 1) [2017] FCA 1114 File number: NSD 952 of 2017
Judge: GRIFFITHS J
Date of judgment: 19 September 2017
Catchwords: EVIDENCE – interlocutory application for an advance ruling under s 192A(a) of the Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) as to the admissibility of expert evidence as relevant to unreasonableness ground of judicial review under the Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth) (ADJR Act) ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – judicial review – admissibility of expert evidence to unreasonableness ground of judicial review under the ADJR Act Held: expert evidence report admissible in principle as relevant to unreasonableness ground of judicial review
Legislation: Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth) s 269ZZM Customs Act 1901 (Cth) ss 269ZZM, 269TAC Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) ss 80, 192A Customs (International Obligations) Regulations 2015 (Cth) reg 43, 45
Cases cited: Australian Retailers Association v Reserve Bank of Australia [2005] FCA 1707; 148 FCR 446 Chandra v Webber [2010] FCA 705; 187 FCR 31 McCormack v Commissioner of Taxation [2001] FCA 1700; 114 FCR 574 Minister for Primary Industries and Energy v Austral Fisheries Pty Ltd (1993) 40 FCR 381 Tim Barr Pty Ltd v Narui Gold Coast Pty Ltd [2008] NSWSC 1263 R (on the application of Lynch) v General Dental Council [2003] EWHC 2987 (Admin)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate