Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Rahman v Commonwealth of Australia as represented by the Australian Taxation Office [2017] FCA 1129 File number: NSD 2226 of 2016
Judge: BROMWICH J
Date of judgment: 22 September 2017
Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – application for judicial review of a decision of the Full Bench of the Fair Work Commission – whether the Full Bench's reasons disclose a failure to consider the applicant's submissions – held: no jurisdictional error – application dismissed PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application to reopen case after judgment reserved – no exceptional circumstances demonstrated – held: application dismissed
Legislation: Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth), ss 400, 604 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), s 37M Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth), s 39B
Cases cited: Aon Risk Services Australia Limited v Australian National University [2009] HCA 27; 239 CLR 175 Barach v University of New South Wales [2010] FWAFB 3307 Davis v Insolvency and Trustee Service Australia (No 2) [2011] FCAFC 9; 190 FCR 437 Director, Fair Work Building Industry Inspectorate v Bolton (No 1) [2016] FCA 816 Eastman v Director of Public Prosecutions of the Australian Capital Territory [2003] HCA 28; 214 CLR 318 Expense Reduction Analysts Group Pty Ltd v Armstrong Strategic Management and Marketing Pty Ltd [2013] HCA 46; 250 CLR 303 Featherby v Commissioner of Taxation [2016] FCA 454 GlaxoSmithKline Australia Pty Ltd v Makin [2010] FWAFB 5343; 197 IR 266 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499 Linfox Australia Pty Ltd v Fair Work Commission [2013] FCAFC 157; 240 IR 178 Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang (1996) 185 CLR 259 R v Army Council; Ex parte Ravenscroft [1917] 2 KB 504 R v Commonwealth Court of Conciliation and Arbitration; Ex parte Ozone Theatres (Aust) Ltd (1949) 78 CLR Rahman v Commonwealth of Australia as represented by the Australian Taxation Office [2016] FWC 4575 Rahman v Commonwealth of Australia as represented by the Australian Taxation Office [2016] FWCFB 7677 Re Refugee Tribunal; Ex parte Aala [2000] HCA 57; 204 CLR 82 Robin Hansen v Calvary Health Care Adelaide Limited [2016] FWC 5223 Soliman v University of Technology, Sydney [2012] FCAFC 146; 207 FCR 277 Toms v Harbour City Ferries Pty Limited [2015] FCAFC 35; 229 FCR 537 Transport Workers' Union of Australia v WA Freightlines Pty Ltd [2011] FWAFB 3863
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate